Identity
What the system is, who stewards it, where it is used, and who it affects.
Ecosystem Passport
A portable, public record for intelligent system identity, evidence, governance, and health.
Ecosystem Passport
What the system is, who stewards it, where it is used, and who it affects.
Research, audits, disclosures, datasets, model cards, incidents, and limitations.
Decision rights, accountability structures, oversight, review cadence, and escalation.
Dimension scores, risk status, unresolved questions, and improvement commitments.
An Ecosystem Passport is a structured record that helps people understand what an intelligent system is, how it is governed, what evidence supports it, and how healthy it appears over time.
Passports are designed to be useful to the public, not only to experts.
Intelligent systems often move faster than institutional memory. Teams change, models update, vendors shift, and deployment contexts expand.
A passport creates continuity. It records the identity, evidence, governance, and health of a system in a way that can travel across organizations and review cycles.
Each passport includes identity, evidence, governance, and health sections.
The structure is intentionally modular so future registries, certifications, and assessment tools can build on the same record.
Health levels communicate whether a system is dormant, emergent, viable, or regenerative.
The goal is not to create a trophy. The goal is to help a system improve in public.
Over time, passports can support public registries, procurement rules, certification programs, incident tracking, and shared learning across sectors.
What the system is, who stewards it, where it is used, and who it affects.
Research, audits, disclosures, datasets, model cards, incidents, and limitations.
Decision rights, accountability structures, oversight, review cadence, and escalation.
Dimension scores, risk status, unresolved questions, and improvement commitments.
Health Levels
The levels make system health legible without pretending that complex social and ecological judgments can be reduced to a badge alone.
0-24
The system has no visible stewardship model or reliable public evidence.
25-49
Basic practices exist, but coverage is uneven and difficult to verify.
50-74
The system meets baseline expectations and has active review loops.
75-100
The system improves human and ecological conditions over time.